Wednesday, January 7, 2015
Sunday, January 4, 2015
A Beautiful Mind
Nash: I still see things that are not here. I just choose not to acknowledge them. Like a diet of the mind, I just choose not to indulge certain appetites; like my appetite for patterns; perhaps my appetite to imagine and dream.
Liis: If I see things, then they are here. I indulge my appetite to acknowledge.
Saturday, January 3, 2015
Move to Trash
"Perhaps the most basic implicit memory is that of oneself, the implicit sense of continuing personal identity. When I awake in the morning, even before I open my eyes, I have the implicit memory(as an implicit feeling) of being the same person that went to sleep the night before. I do not need to recall explicitly that I am the same person, nor do I explicitly recognize or thematize the feeling of sameness; but this implicit feeling of being the same abides with me and provides a narrative ground or core for my sense of self and for my perception of the world." (Shusterman, R. Thinking Through The Body)
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
Tripping over Kharms and the collision of objects by Alissa Šnaider.
Here appears Kharms.
He was not Kharms at first; his real name was Daniil Ivanovich Yuyachev.
Later, in his 20-ies he starts to create pseudonyms for himself. In total around 30 of them but one the most popular turned out to be Daniil Kharms. Kharms is derived from the English words "harms", "charms" and "Holmes", as in Sherlock, the fictional detective whose sartorial style he followed as an example.
Let’s start again.
Here appears Kharms.
As he himself claimed, he was born twice.
First time he was born but then pushed back in. Second time he was born. Maybe he was never born at all. Perhaps ‘’we don’t even know who we’re talking about,’’ as Kharms admitted about the redheaded man.
Kharms was sent to a very strict school in St. Petersburg, where he learned English and German.
The parents: the mother ran a refuge for women who were released from prison. The father was a former member of the People's Will revolutionary organization, who later became a pacifist.
Kharms – a kid finding himself first playing football in the middle of Revolution’s field, after growing up into the civil war, later on hiding in the basements and smoky city bars from the terror of Stalin, in the very end loosing his comrades into Syberian labor camps, finally rotting away in a prison hospital during the Leningrad Blockade: unheard, unpublished, spitted on and erased from the surface of soviet reality.
Kharms became an involved and active writer in the times of Great Terror of Stalin, a
period of hunger, cruelty, censorship and poverty. Affected by everyday reality he started
to become interested in nonsense that had no practical meaning. The Russian word
‘’chush’’ (nonsense) stands for rubbish, a bunch of crap or something that happens by
chance in the most everyday sense. It stands for something meaningless.
Seriousness was the fundament that held ideology together in the Soviet Union. And all of a sudden there is Kharms with his nonsensical writing. Nonsense was seen as a protest against the dictatorship of the proletariat. The roots of Kharms interest in nonsensical things and events would lead to unavoidable prison. Nevertheless Kharms kept on writing.
In Kharmsian reality, absurd life is real life. One can glimpse upon it only through the means of the oddest objects, through the weirdest gestures and through the events that make no rational sense.
In OBERIU manifesto Kharms wrote about himself:
He was not Kharms at first; his real name was Daniil Ivanovich Yuyachev.
Later, in his 20-ies he starts to create pseudonyms for himself. In total around 30 of them but one the most popular turned out to be Daniil Kharms. Kharms is derived from the English words "harms", "charms" and "Holmes", as in Sherlock, the fictional detective whose sartorial style he followed as an example.
Let’s start again.
Here appears Kharms.
As he himself claimed, he was born twice.
First time he was born but then pushed back in. Second time he was born. Maybe he was never born at all. Perhaps ‘’we don’t even know who we’re talking about,’’ as Kharms admitted about the redheaded man.
Kharms was sent to a very strict school in St. Petersburg, where he learned English and German.
The parents: the mother ran a refuge for women who were released from prison. The father was a former member of the People's Will revolutionary organization, who later became a pacifist.
Kharms – a kid finding himself first playing football in the middle of Revolution’s field, after growing up into the civil war, later on hiding in the basements and smoky city bars from the terror of Stalin, in the very end loosing his comrades into Syberian labor camps, finally rotting away in a prison hospital during the Leningrad Blockade: unheard, unpublished, spitted on and erased from the surface of soviet reality.
The light in the room is blinking as if it is breathing
Seriousness was the fundament that held ideology together in the Soviet Union. And all of a sudden there is Kharms with his nonsensical writing. Nonsense was seen as a protest against the dictatorship of the proletariat. The roots of Kharms interest in nonsensical things and events would lead to unavoidable prison. Nevertheless Kharms kept on writing.
In Kharmsian reality, absurd life is real life. One can glimpse upon it only through the means of the oddest objects, through the weirdest gestures and through the events that make no rational sense.
In OBERIU manifesto Kharms wrote about himself:
’A poet and dramaturge who’s attention is not focused on a static object but on the collision ofobjects and
their correlation. In the moment of action an object takes new concrete outlines, full of actual meaning.
The action converted into a new way holds in itself ‘’the classical print’’ and at the same time represents a
wide range of OBERIU’s perception of the world.’’
By the action of collision he would make an attempt to cleanse words of their ‘’normal’’ meanings and ‘’undress’’ the objects from their functions and uses. That reminds me of Kharms’ credo about a poem where ‘’verses that are as concrete as things can, so that, if thrown at a window, the window would break’’. Here the two objects – the poem and the window collide and invite new meaning in.
Another thing in Kharmsian world is the sense of being right. According to Kharms, to be right, means also to be wrong, means to contain a slight error and only through mistakes and errors something or someone will be truly real.
For Kharms a work of art has to exist in the world as a rock, as a sun, as grass; as an object.
"When I write poetry, the most important thing for me is not the idea, not the contents and not the form and not the obscure notion of "quality", but something even more obscure and unintelligible to the rational mind, but understandable to me...This is--purity of order. This purity is the same in the sun, in the grass, in man, and in poetry. Real art stands side by side with the first reality. It creates the world and is its first reflection." Kharms wrote in a letter to a friend.
Once during a literary evening where Kharms performed his poetry he met Alexander Vvedensky (Russian poet and avant-garde artist). They soon became good friends and comrades. Later they both were invited to become members of the ‘’Zaum’’ (literal translation from Russian – ‘’beyond the mind’’) movement, founded in 1913 by Kruchenykh. Kruchenykh defined Zaum as “a language which does not have any definite meaning, a trans rational language” that “allows for fuller expression and that can become a universal language, born originally and not artificially, like Esperanto”.
Later on Kharms and Vvedensky formed a separate branch of Zaum, calling themselves the Chinari. Chinari’s only one literal evening ended with the audience whistling, spitting on the performers and with brutal fights in the audience.
But that was not enough for their ambitions and in 1927 Kharms proposed the creation of an Academy of Left Classics. The aim of this movement would be to ‘’struggle against hacks’’. And that is when OBERIU (Russian: ОБэРИу - Объединение реального искусства; English: the Union of Real Art or the Association for Real Art) was founded.
OBERIU – an avant-garde collective of Russian Futurist writers, musicians, artists, writers that lived in the late 1920’s and 1930’s, emerged in the times of "intense centralization of Soviet Culture" and the decline of the avant-garde culture of Leningrad, when ‘’leftist’’ groups were increasingly repressed.
By the action of collision he would make an attempt to cleanse words of their ‘’normal’’ meanings and ‘’undress’’ the objects from their functions and uses. That reminds me of Kharms’ credo about a poem where ‘’verses that are as concrete as things can, so that, if thrown at a window, the window would break’’. Here the two objects – the poem and the window collide and invite new meaning in.
Another thing in Kharmsian world is the sense of being right. According to Kharms, to be right, means also to be wrong, means to contain a slight error and only through mistakes and errors something or someone will be truly real.
For Kharms a work of art has to exist in the world as a rock, as a sun, as grass; as an object.
"When I write poetry, the most important thing for me is not the idea, not the contents and not the form and not the obscure notion of "quality", but something even more obscure and unintelligible to the rational mind, but understandable to me...This is--purity of order. This purity is the same in the sun, in the grass, in man, and in poetry. Real art stands side by side with the first reality. It creates the world and is its first reflection." Kharms wrote in a letter to a friend.
Once during a literary evening where Kharms performed his poetry he met Alexander Vvedensky (Russian poet and avant-garde artist). They soon became good friends and comrades. Later they both were invited to become members of the ‘’Zaum’’ (literal translation from Russian – ‘’beyond the mind’’) movement, founded in 1913 by Kruchenykh. Kruchenykh defined Zaum as “a language which does not have any definite meaning, a trans rational language” that “allows for fuller expression and that can become a universal language, born originally and not artificially, like Esperanto”.
Later on Kharms and Vvedensky formed a separate branch of Zaum, calling themselves the Chinari. Chinari’s only one literal evening ended with the audience whistling, spitting on the performers and with brutal fights in the audience.
But that was not enough for their ambitions and in 1927 Kharms proposed the creation of an Academy of Left Classics. The aim of this movement would be to ‘’struggle against hacks’’. And that is when OBERIU (Russian: ОБэРИу - Объединение реального искусства; English: the Union of Real Art or the Association for Real Art) was founded.
I miss Wundik very much.
Last time I saw him was in Tallinn, 18.08.2013
45 minutes in the green grass
He looked sick but same wise.
OBERIU – an avant-garde collective of Russian Futurist writers, musicians, artists, writers that lived in the late 1920’s and 1930’s, emerged in the times of "intense centralization of Soviet Culture" and the decline of the avant-garde culture of Leningrad, when ‘’leftist’’ groups were increasingly repressed.
In its manifesto, the OBERIU said its main task was ‘’to portray the world in a clearly
objectified manner. “ They called themselves a new avant-garde of the revolutionary Left in
fine arts, theater, cinema, music and literature.“Art is a cupboard,” the group stated, and
“Poems aren't pies; we aren't herring.”
One year later Kharms started to work for the children's magazine "Yozh" ("Hedgehog"), edited by Marshak, in order to survive and have a chance to publish at least some of his texts in disguise.
It sounds strange, but kids really loved his stories, with all the irrationality, chance and cruelty that were so typical for Kharms. But Kharms himself really didn’t like children just as he could not stand old women and corpses. Perhaps this was because Kharms sensed the presence of death on both edges of the age.
“I don't like children, old men, old women and the reasonable middle-aged. To poison children - that would be harsh. But, hell, something needs to be done with them! ...’’ -Daniil Kharms
Kharms played in his texts with the subject of the meaninglessness of human existence and at the same time the desire of people to have meaning in their lives. He played with hopeless hope.
In 1938 Kharms hosted a musical-literary experiment evening in his apartment. At the entrance he placed a note ‘’ List of Persons Particularly Respected in This House’’. The list welcomed Bach, Gogol, Glinka, Goethe, Lewis Carroll and Knut Hamsun.
I happened to be reading an introduction by Matvei Yankelevich titled ‘’The Real Kharms’’ from the book ‘’Today I wrote Nothing’’, where Yankelevich writes that
Kharms believed that his poem-object exists not only as ‘’another created object in the world’’ but also as a thing that does something. The written word passes the thing and becomes an action. If words create the world then something is ‘’happening’’. The act of writing is an act in the world, a gesture - that opens the world up to the new possibility of the connections, to new objects, new events.
Taking the paragraph above into consideration, one might say that Kharms believed in destruction of the old in order to make space for new. In his texts he used interruption as a tool to avoid the logical order and to break the old meaning. Subjects such as death, violence, love, affection, heroism are flattened to be equal and of the same sense, being served through the prism of comedy. These subjects loose their qualities, properties and become something else. Kharms would often say: "... Little by little a man loses his shape and becomes a sphere. And once he is a sphere, a man loses all his desires."
One year later Kharms started to work for the children's magazine "Yozh" ("Hedgehog"), edited by Marshak, in order to survive and have a chance to publish at least some of his texts in disguise.
It sounds strange, but kids really loved his stories, with all the irrationality, chance and cruelty that were so typical for Kharms. But Kharms himself really didn’t like children just as he could not stand old women and corpses. Perhaps this was because Kharms sensed the presence of death on both edges of the age.
“I don't like children, old men, old women and the reasonable middle-aged. To poison children - that would be harsh. But, hell, something needs to be done with them! ...’’ -Daniil Kharms
Kharms played in his texts with the subject of the meaninglessness of human existence and at the same time the desire of people to have meaning in their lives. He played with hopeless hope.
Silence is moving towards the fog.
Can you hear it?
In 1938 Kharms hosted a musical-literary experiment evening in his apartment. At the entrance he placed a note ‘’ List of Persons Particularly Respected in This House’’. The list welcomed Bach, Gogol, Glinka, Goethe, Lewis Carroll and Knut Hamsun.
I happened to be reading an introduction by Matvei Yankelevich titled ‘’The Real Kharms’’ from the book ‘’Today I wrote Nothing’’, where Yankelevich writes that
Kharms believed that his poem-object exists not only as ‘’another created object in the world’’ but also as a thing that does something. The written word passes the thing and becomes an action. If words create the world then something is ‘’happening’’. The act of writing is an act in the world, a gesture - that opens the world up to the new possibility of the connections, to new objects, new events.
Taking the paragraph above into consideration, one might say that Kharms believed in destruction of the old in order to make space for new. In his texts he used interruption as a tool to avoid the logical order and to break the old meaning. Subjects such as death, violence, love, affection, heroism are flattened to be equal and of the same sense, being served through the prism of comedy. These subjects loose their qualities, properties and become something else. Kharms would often say: "... Little by little a man loses his shape and becomes a sphere. And once he is a sphere, a man loses all his desires."
Kharms consciously developed small performances for the NKVD agents who
interrogated him. Performances consisting of strange hiccup-snorting seizures and the
shielding of his thoughts from others by wearing all kind of objects on his head.
On 23 August 1941, he was arrested third time. The doorman asked him to come down
into the courtyard for something. After that Kharms disappeared; half- dressed, wearing
slippers on his bare feet.
Kharms died on 2 February 1942, in a prison hospital in Novosibirsk.
Or maybe Kharms never existed and instead Daniil Ivanovich Yuyachev died on 2 February 1942, in a prison hospital in Novosibirsk, leaving Kharms’ traces of absence hidden in between the times and the black and white lines.
Not only he himself vanished from the surface of the earth, but also all of his works. They reappeared only after 30 years in Samizdat – a form that existed around the Soviet bloc, where individuals would reproduce ‘’forbidden’’ publications by hand and pass the published materials from reader to reader.
Interrogation No.2
...’’Summing up my deposition, I confess that the activity of our group in the sphere of children’s
literature had an anti-Soviet character and did significant damage to the cause of forming the rising Soviet
generation. Our books separated the reader from contemporary concrete reality and acted in a destructive
way on the imagination of the child. In particular, from this point of view I can also point a poem entitled
‘’Liar,’’ published in the journal ‘’Hedgehog,’’ which contains elements devoid of sense.’’
-Daniil Khrms. December 23, 1931, Interrogator: A. Buznikov
When is it going to stop?
Here everything stopped
Kharms died on 2 February 1942, in a prison hospital in Novosibirsk.
Or maybe Kharms never existed and instead Daniil Ivanovich Yuyachev died on 2 February 1942, in a prison hospital in Novosibirsk, leaving Kharms’ traces of absence hidden in between the times and the black and white lines.
Not only he himself vanished from the surface of the earth, but also all of his works. They reappeared only after 30 years in Samizdat – a form that existed around the Soviet bloc, where individuals would reproduce ‘’forbidden’’ publications by hand and pass the published materials from reader to reader.
“Bizarre violence, peculiar digressions and sudden twists; direct, visceral and yet with something hidden
...” - Daniil Kharms about himself
‘’Now the time has come to say that, not only at Nikolai Ivanovich's back, but also in front of him—at
his chest, as it were—and all around him, there is nothing. A complete absence of any existence. Or, as
someone once said in jest, an absence of any presence.’’
-Daniil Kharms
Tuesday, September 2, 2014
Morning warm up
Let’s imagine:
There is a
cat, a magnet and a performance. Next to the performance you can see a bottle
of vodka sitting on a bar.
There is a
magnet, a performance and a bottle of vodka. Next to the bottle of vodka you
can see a cat sitting on a bar.
There is a
bottle of vodka, a magnet and a cat. Next to the cat you can see a performance
sitting on a bar.
But we don’t give
a damn because we are only interested in the bottle of vodka.
Let’s return:
There is a
cat, a magnet, a bottle of vodka. Next to a bottle of vodka there is a
performance sitting on a bar.
Here is a good
time to mention one of the equation that I am working on:
Number one is
standing and blinking her eyes. Number two appears to replace the first one,
but by mistake trips over her own shoe, falls down on the floor and looses her
consciousness. Number three appears to replace number two, but doesn’t notice
her lying on the floor and therefore tries to replace number one. Number one
gets confused, quits her something action, but doesn’t swear; instead she tries
to take herself into hands or gather herself together. Namely, number one tries
to connect with number three and that way pick up number two from the floor to
make her stand so that the system could function. But because number two lost
her consciousness, once on her feet she immediately falls back down. The
hopeless attempt of number one continues for quite a while.
Here I remembered that I had to go and buy some
cigarettes.
Besides, we don’t give a damn because we are only
interested in the bottle of vodka.
Another part appears:
There is a
magnet, a bottle of vodka and a performance. Next to a performance you can see
a cat sitting on the bar.
But take note of the fact that behind a cat there is nothing. It's not that there isn't a cupboard there, or a chest of drawers, or at any rate some such object: but there is absolutely nothing there, not even air.
Believe it or not, as you please, but behind a cat’s back there is not even an airless expanse, or as they say, universal ether. To put it bluntly, there's nothing.
This is, of course, utterly inconceivable.
Once again,
from the beginning:
There is a
magnet, a bottle of vodka and a cat. Next to a cat you can see a performance
sitting on the bar.
Now the time has come to say that not only behind a performance, but before it as well -- as it were, in front of it -- and all the way around it, there is nothing. A complete absence of any kind of existence, or, an absence of any kind of presence.
There is a
performance, a bottle of vodka and a cat. Next to a cat there is a magnet
sitting on the bar.
But, anyway, what are we talking about? Surely we said that inside, as well as outside a magnet nothing exists. So if both inside and outside nothing exists, then that means that the bottle as well doesn't exist. Isn't that it?
But, on the other hand, take note of the following: if we are saying that nothing exists either inside or outside, then the question arises: inside and outside of what? Something evidently, all the same, does exist? Or perhaps doesn't exist. In which case, why do we keep saying 'inside' and 'outside'? No, here we have patently reached an impasse. And we ourselves don't know what to say.
Goodbye for now.
http://www.alissasnaider.com/
Friday, November 8, 2013
See tekst mida kõik ei ole jõudnud jälgida (RUS/EST/ENG):
Ноам Хомски - 10 способов манипулирования людьми с помощью СМИ :
1 — Отвлечение внимания
2 — Создавать проблемы, а затем предлагать способы их решения
3 — Способ постепенного применения
4 — Отсрочка исполнения
5 — Обращаться к народу как к малым детям
6 — Делать упор на эмоции в гораздо большей степени, чем на размышления
7 — Держать людей в невежестве, культивируя посредственность
8 — Побуждать граждан восторгаться посредственностью
9 — Усиливать чувство собственной вины
10 — Знать о людях больше, чем они сами о себе знают
источник > http://www.adme.ru/psihologiya/10-sposobov-manipulirovaniya-lyudmi-s-pomoschyu-smi-406155/
Noam Chomsky - 10 meediapoolset manipuleerimisstrateegiat
1. Tähelepanu kõrvaletõmbamise strateegia.
Sotsiaalse kontrolli peamine element on tähelepanu kõrvaletõmbamine, mis suunab avalikkuse tähelepanu poliitilise ja majandusliku eliidi poolt suunatud olulistelt teemadelt ja muutustelt eemale, kasutades üleujutuse tehnikat või tekitades pidevat segadust ja ebaolulist informatsiooni. Tähelepanu kõrvaletõmbamise strateegia on samuti vajalik selleks, et ära hoida avalikku huvi teadmiste vastu teaduses, majanduses, psühholoogias, neurobioloogias ja küberneetikas. „Olukorra säilitamine, milles avalik tähelepanu on reaalsetest sotsiaalsetest probleemidest kõrvale juhitud, ja seda paeluvad asjad, millel pole reaalset tähtsust. Hoia avalikkus hõivatud, hõivatud, hõivatud, nii et mõtlemiseks pole aega – oleme tagasi farmis ja teiste loomade seas (tsitaat „Vaikse sõja tasastest relvadest“)
2. Tekita probleem ja seejärel paku lahendus
Seda meetodit kutsutakse ka "probleem-reaktsioon-lahenduseks". selle meetodiga luuakse probleem - "situatsioon", mis on mõeldud publikus mingisugust reaktsiooni põhjustama - niisiis on see peamine nendest sammudest, mida soovid omaks võtta. näiteks lase sellel linnavägivalda demonstreerida ning intensiivistada; või korralda oma verised rünnakud nii, et publik oleks vägivallataotleja turvaseadusteks ja poliisideks vabaduse kahjustuse vastu. (ei ole kindel, et sain õigesti aru).
või tekita majanduskriis, et see vastu võtta vajaliku õela sotsiaalsete õiguste tagasivõtmise ning avalike teenuste lammutamisena.
3. Järkjärgulise kasutuse strateegia
Selleks, et saavutada lubamatut määra, piisab sellest, kui juurutada seda järkjärgult, tilgutina, aastast aastasse. See on täpselt see, mida radikaalselt uued sotsioökonoomilised tingimused (neoliberalism) rakendasid 1980ndate ja 1990ndate paiku: riigi funktsioonide minimeerimine, erastamine, ebakindlus, paindlikkus, massiline töötus, palgad, kuid mitte selleks, et võimaldada korralikku sissetulekut – kõik need muutused, mis üheaegsel rakendamisel oleksid kaasa toonud revolutsiooni.
4. Edasilükkamise strateegia
Veel üks võimalus, kuidas suruda läbi ebapopulaarset otsust on esitada see „valuliku ja vajalikuna“, et saavutada antud ajahetkel kodanike heakskiit otsuse rakendamiseks tulevikus. Kergem on leppida tuleviku ohverdustega, kui seda teha koheselt. Esiteks sellepärast, et vastavat jõupingutust ei kasutata koheselt. Seejärel sellepärast, et kodanikel, massidel on tendents naiivselt eeldada, et „homme on kõik parem“ ja vastavat ohverdust saab vältida. See annab kodanikele muutuse ideega harjumiseks rohkem aega, et aja saabudes seda allaheitlikult aktsepteerida.
5. Pöörduda rahva kui väikeste laste poole
Enamikes propagandistlikes etteastetes, mis on mõeldud suuremale publikule, kasutatakse selliseid argumente, tegeleaskujusid, sõnu ja tooni, nagu oleks tegemist arengus pidama jäänud koolilastega või vaimse puudega isikutega. Mida rohkem üritab keegi eksitada kuulajat, seda rohkem ta püüab kasutada infantiilseid kõne vorme.
6. Kasutada emotsionaalset poolt enam kui reflektsiooni
Emotsionaalse aspekti ära kasutamine on klassikaline tehnika selleks, et kindlustada ratsionaalse analüüsi ning viimaks ka üksikisiku kriitilise meele lühiajalist tööringlust. Tagatipuks avab emotsionaalse registri kasutamine ukse teadvustamatusse selleks, et siirdada või pookida külge ideid, ihasid, hirme ja rahutust, sundseisundeid või suunata käitumist …
7. Hoida publikut teadmatuses ja käskpärasuses
Muuta publik arusaamisvõimetuks tehnoloogiatest ja meetoditest, mida kasutatakse kontrollimisel ja orjastamisel. „Hariduse kvaliteet, mis on mõeldud madalamatele sotsiaalsetele klassidele, peab olema võimalikult vaene ja keskpärane selleks, et madalamate ja kõrgemate klasside vahel olev tühik oleks ja jääks madalamatele klassidele ületamatuks (Vaata „Silent Weapons for Quiet War).“
8. Julgustada publikut rahulduma keskpärasusega
Julgusta publikut arvama, et loll, vulgaarne ning harimatu olla on moekas.
9. Enesesüüdistuse tugevdamine
Lase indiviididel iseend endi ebaõnnes süüdistada nende intelligentsuse, võimete või jõupingutuste luhtumise tõttu. Niisiis, selle asemel, et majanduslike süsteemidega võidelda, saab inimese osaks süütunne, mis loob depressiooni, mille mõju on tegude ära hoidmine. Ilma teota pole ka revolutsiooni!
10. Õppida inimesi tundma paremini kui nad iseennast tunnevad
Viimase 50 aasta jooksul on kiireneva teaduse edusammud genereerinud kasvava lõhe üldise teadmise ning nende teadmiste vahel, kes omavad ja opereerivad domineerivaid eliite. Tänu bioloogiale, neurobioloogiale ning rakenduslikule psühholoogiale, on „süsteem“ saanud nautida keerulist arusaama inimloomast, nii füüsiliselt kui psühholoogiliselt. Süsteem on paremini tuttavaks saanud tavainimesega kui tavainimene ise.
See tähendab, et enamikel juhtudel rakendab suuremat kontrolli ning võimu indiviidide üle – suuremat, kui indiviidid enda üle.
Täname meie vabatahtlikke eesti keelse tõlke eest :
Liisa Lotte Elme
Tanel Rander
Kaie Otstak
Jekaterina Novosjolova
Jelena Ivanova
Noam Chomsky - “10 strategies of manipulation” by the media
1. The strategy of distraction
The primary element of social control is the strategy of distraction which is to divert public attention from important issues and changes determined by the political and economic elites, by the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information. distraction strategy is also essential to prevent the public interest in the essential knowledge in the area of the science, economics, psychology, neurobiology and cybernetics. “Maintaining public attention diverted away from the real social problems, captivated by matters of no real importance. Keep the public busy, busy, busy, no time to think, back to farm and other animals (quote from text Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).”
2. Create problems, then offer solutions
This method is also called “problem -reaction- solution. “It creates a problem, a “situation” referred to cause some reaction in the audience, so this is the principal of the steps that you want to accept. For example: let it unfold and intensify urban violence, or arrange for bloody attacks in order that the public is the applicant‟s security laws and policies to the detriment of freedom. Or: create an economic crisis to accept as a necessary evil retreat of social rights and the dismantling of public services.
3. The gradual strategy
Acceptance to an unacceptable degree, just apply it gradually, dropper, for consecutive years. That is how they radically new socioeconomic conditions ( neoliberalism ) were imposed during the 1980s and 1990s: the minimal state, privatization, precariousness, flexibility, massive unemployment, wages, and do not guarantee a decent income, so many changes that have brought about a revolution if they had been applied once.
4. The strategy of deferring
Another way to accept an unpopular decision is to present it as “painful and necessary”, gaining public acceptance, at the time for future application. It is easier to accept that a future sacrifice of immediate slaughter. First, because the effort is not used immediately. Then, because the public, masses, is always the tendency to expect naively that “everything will be better tomorrow” and that the sacrifice required may be avoided. This gives the public more time to get used to the idea of change and accept it with resignation when the time comes.
5. Go to the public as a little child
Most of the advertising to the general public uses speech, argument, people and particularly children‟s intonation, often close to the weakness, as if the viewer were a little child or a mentally deficient. The harder one tries to deceive the viewer look, the more it tends to adopt a tone infantilising. Why? “If one goes to a person as if she had the age of 12 years or less, then, because of suggestion, she tends with a certain probability that a response or reaction also devoid of a critical sense as a person 12 years or younger (see Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).”
6. Use the emotional side more than the reflection
Making use of the emotional aspect is a classic technique for causing a short circuit on rational analysis , and finally to the critical sense of the individual. Furthermore, the use of emotional register to open the door to the unconscious for implantation or grafting ideas , desires, fears and anxieties , compulsions, or induce behaviors…
7. Keep the public in ignorance and mediocrity
Making the public incapable of understanding the technologies and methods used to control and enslavement. “The quality of education given to the lower social classes must be the poor and mediocre as possible so that the gap of ignorance it plans among the lower classes and upper classes is and remains impossible to attain for the lower classes (See „ Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).”
8. To encourage the public to be complacent with mediocrity
Promote the public to believe that the fact is fashionable to be stupid, vulgar and uneducated…
9. Self-blame Strengthen
To let individual blame for their misfortune, because of the failure of their intelligence, their abilities, or their efforts. So, instead of rebelling against the economic system, the individual autodesvalida and guilt, which creates a depression, one of whose effects is to inhibit its action. And, without action, there is no revolution!
10. Getting to know the individuals better than they know themselves
Over the past 50 years, advances of accelerated science has generated a growing gap between public knowledge and those owned and operated by dominant elites. Thanks to biology, neurobiology and applied psychology, the “system” has enjoyed a sophisticated understanding of human beings, both physically and psychologically. The system has gotten better acquainted with the common man more than he knows himself. This means that, in most cases, the system exerts greater control and great power over individuals, greater than that of individuals about themselves.
source > http://noam-chomsky.tumblr.com/post/13867896307/noam-chomsky-10-strategies-of-manipulation-by-the
Ноам Хомски - 10 способов манипулирования людьми с помощью СМИ :
1 — Отвлечение внимания
Основным элементом управления обществом является отвлечение внимания людей от важных проблем и решений, принимаемых политическими и экономическими правящими кругами, посредством постоянного насыщения информационного пространства малозначительными сообщениями. Прием отвлечения внимания весьма существенен для того, чтобы не дать гражданам возможности получать важные знания в области науки, экономики, психологии, нейробиологии и кибернетики. «Постоянно отвлекать внимание граждан от настоящих социальных проблем, переключая его на темы, не имеющие реального значения. Добиваться того, чтобы граждане постоянно были чем-то заняты и у них не оставалось времени на размышления; с поля — в загон, как и все прочие животные (цитата из книги «Тихое оружие для спокойных войн»).
2 — Создавать проблемы, а затем предлагать способы их решения
Данный метод также называется «проблема-реакция-решение». Создается проблема, некая «ситуация», рассчитанная на то, чтобы вызвать определенную реакцию среди населения с тем, чтобы оно само потребовало принятия мер, которые необходимы правящим кругам. Например, допустить раскручивание спирали насилия в городах или организовать кровавые теракты для того, чтобы граждане потребовали принятия законов об усилении мер безопасности и проведения политики, ущемляющей гражданские свободы. Или: вызвать экономический кризис, чтобы заставить принять как необходимое зло нарушение социальных прав и сворачивание работы городских служб.
3 — Способ постепенного применения
Чтобы добиться принятия какой-либо непопулярной меры, достаточно внедрять ее постепенно, день за днем, год за годом. Именно таким образом были навязаны принципиально новые социально-экономические условия (неолиберализм) в 80-х и 90-х годах прошлого века. Сведение к минимуму функций государства, приватизация, неуверенность, нестабильность, массовая безработица, заработная плата, которая уже не обеспечивает достойную жизнь. Если бы все это произошло одновременно, то наверняка привело бы к революции.
4 — Отсрочка исполнения
Другой способ продавить непопулярное решение заключается в том, чтобы представить его в качестве «болезненного и необходимого» и добиться в данный момент согласия граждан на его осуществление в будущем. Гораздо проще согласиться на какие-либо жертвы в будущем, чем в настоящем. Во-первых, потому что это не произойдет немедленно. Во-вторых, потому, что народ в массе своей всегда склонен лелеять наивные надежды на то, что «завтра все изменится к лучшему» и что тех жертв, которых от него требуют, удастся избежать. Это предоставляет гражданам больше времени для того, чтобы свыкнуться с мыслью о переменах и смиренно принять их, когда наступит время.
5 — Обращаться к народу как к малым детям
В большинстве пропагандистских выступлений, рассчитанных на широкую публику, используются такие доводы, персонажи, слова и интонация, как будто речь идет о детях школьного возраста с задержкой в развитии или умственно неполноценных индивидуумах. Чем усиленнее кто-то пытается ввести в заблуждение слушающего, тем в большей степени он старается использовать инфантильные речевые обороты. Почему? Если кто-то обращается к человеку так, как будто ему 12 или меньше лет, то в силу внушаемости, в ответ или реакции этого человека, с определенной степенью вероятности, также будет отсутствовать критическая оценка, что характерно для детей в возрасте 12 или менее лет.
6 — Делать упор на эмоции в гораздо большей степени, чем на размышления
Воздействие на эмоции представляет из себя классический прием, направленный на то, чтобы заблокировать способность людей к рациональному анализу, а в итоге и вообще к способности критического осмысления происходящего. С другой стороны, использование эмоционального фактора позволяет открыть дверь в подсознательное для того, чтобы внедрять туда мысли, желания, страхи, опасения, принуждения или устойчивые модели поведения…
Добиваться того, чтобы люди стали неспособны понимать приемы и методы, используемые для того, чтобы ими управлять и подчинять своей воле. «Качество образования, предоставляемого низшим общественным классам, должно быть как можно более скудным и посредственным с тем, чтобы невежество, отделяющее низшие общественные классы от высших, оставалось на уровне, который не смогут преодолеть низшие классы.
Внедрять в население мысль о том, что модно быть тупым, пошлым и невоспитанным…
Заставить человека уверовать в то, что только он виновен в собственных несчастьях, которые происходят ввиду недостатка его умственных возможностей, способностей или прилагаемых усилий. В результате, вместо того, чтобы восстать против экономической системы, человек начинает заниматься самоуничижением, обвиняя во всем самого себя, что вызывает подавленное состояние, приводящее, в числе прочего, к бездействию. А без действия ни о какой революции и речи быть не может!
10 — Знать о людях больше, чем они сами о себе знают
В течение последних 50 лет успехи в развитии науки привели к образованию все увеличивающегося разрыва между знаниями простых людей и сведениями, которыми обладают и пользуются господствующие классы. Благодаря биологии, нейробиологии и прикладной психологии, «система» получила в свое распоряжение передовые знания о человеке, как в области физиологии, так и психики. Системе удалось узнать об обычном человеке больше, чем он сам о себе знает. Это означает, что в большинстве случаев система обладает большей властью и в большей степени управляет людьми, чем они сами.
источник > http://www.adme.ru/psihologiya/10-sposobov-manipulirovaniya-lyudmi-s-pomoschyu-smi-406155/
Noam Chomsky - 10 meediapoolset manipuleerimisstrateegiat
1. Tähelepanu kõrvaletõmbamise strateegia.
Sotsiaalse kontrolli peamine element on tähelepanu kõrvaletõmbamine, mis suunab avalikkuse tähelepanu poliitilise ja majandusliku eliidi poolt suunatud olulistelt teemadelt ja muutustelt eemale, kasutades üleujutuse tehnikat või tekitades pidevat segadust ja ebaolulist informatsiooni. Tähelepanu kõrvaletõmbamise strateegia on samuti vajalik selleks, et ära hoida avalikku huvi teadmiste vastu teaduses, majanduses, psühholoogias, neurobioloogias ja küberneetikas. „Olukorra säilitamine, milles avalik tähelepanu on reaalsetest sotsiaalsetest probleemidest kõrvale juhitud, ja seda paeluvad asjad, millel pole reaalset tähtsust. Hoia avalikkus hõivatud, hõivatud, hõivatud, nii et mõtlemiseks pole aega – oleme tagasi farmis ja teiste loomade seas (tsitaat „Vaikse sõja tasastest relvadest“)
2. Tekita probleem ja seejärel paku lahendus
Seda meetodit kutsutakse ka "probleem-reaktsioon-lahenduseks". selle meetodiga luuakse probleem - "situatsioon", mis on mõeldud publikus mingisugust reaktsiooni põhjustama - niisiis on see peamine nendest sammudest, mida soovid omaks võtta. näiteks lase sellel linnavägivalda demonstreerida ning intensiivistada; või korralda oma verised rünnakud nii, et publik oleks vägivallataotleja turvaseadusteks ja poliisideks vabaduse kahjustuse vastu. (ei ole kindel, et sain õigesti aru).
või tekita majanduskriis, et see vastu võtta vajaliku õela sotsiaalsete õiguste tagasivõtmise ning avalike teenuste lammutamisena.
3. Järkjärgulise kasutuse strateegia
Selleks, et saavutada lubamatut määra, piisab sellest, kui juurutada seda järkjärgult, tilgutina, aastast aastasse. See on täpselt see, mida radikaalselt uued sotsioökonoomilised tingimused (neoliberalism) rakendasid 1980ndate ja 1990ndate paiku: riigi funktsioonide minimeerimine, erastamine, ebakindlus, paindlikkus, massiline töötus, palgad, kuid mitte selleks, et võimaldada korralikku sissetulekut – kõik need muutused, mis üheaegsel rakendamisel oleksid kaasa toonud revolutsiooni.
4. Edasilükkamise strateegia
Veel üks võimalus, kuidas suruda läbi ebapopulaarset otsust on esitada see „valuliku ja vajalikuna“, et saavutada antud ajahetkel kodanike heakskiit otsuse rakendamiseks tulevikus. Kergem on leppida tuleviku ohverdustega, kui seda teha koheselt. Esiteks sellepärast, et vastavat jõupingutust ei kasutata koheselt. Seejärel sellepärast, et kodanikel, massidel on tendents naiivselt eeldada, et „homme on kõik parem“ ja vastavat ohverdust saab vältida. See annab kodanikele muutuse ideega harjumiseks rohkem aega, et aja saabudes seda allaheitlikult aktsepteerida.
5. Pöörduda rahva kui väikeste laste poole
Enamikes propagandistlikes etteastetes, mis on mõeldud suuremale publikule, kasutatakse selliseid argumente, tegeleaskujusid, sõnu ja tooni, nagu oleks tegemist arengus pidama jäänud koolilastega või vaimse puudega isikutega. Mida rohkem üritab keegi eksitada kuulajat, seda rohkem ta püüab kasutada infantiilseid kõne vorme.
6. Kasutada emotsionaalset poolt enam kui reflektsiooni
Emotsionaalse aspekti ära kasutamine on klassikaline tehnika selleks, et kindlustada ratsionaalse analüüsi ning viimaks ka üksikisiku kriitilise meele lühiajalist tööringlust. Tagatipuks avab emotsionaalse registri kasutamine ukse teadvustamatusse selleks, et siirdada või pookida külge ideid, ihasid, hirme ja rahutust, sundseisundeid või suunata käitumist …
7. Hoida publikut teadmatuses ja käskpärasuses
Muuta publik arusaamisvõimetuks tehnoloogiatest ja meetoditest, mida kasutatakse kontrollimisel ja orjastamisel. „Hariduse kvaliteet, mis on mõeldud madalamatele sotsiaalsetele klassidele, peab olema võimalikult vaene ja keskpärane selleks, et madalamate ja kõrgemate klasside vahel olev tühik oleks ja jääks madalamatele klassidele ületamatuks (Vaata „Silent Weapons for Quiet War).“
8. Julgustada publikut rahulduma keskpärasusega
Julgusta publikut arvama, et loll, vulgaarne ning harimatu olla on moekas.
9. Enesesüüdistuse tugevdamine
Lase indiviididel iseend endi ebaõnnes süüdistada nende intelligentsuse, võimete või jõupingutuste luhtumise tõttu. Niisiis, selle asemel, et majanduslike süsteemidega võidelda, saab inimese osaks süütunne, mis loob depressiooni, mille mõju on tegude ära hoidmine. Ilma teota pole ka revolutsiooni!
10. Õppida inimesi tundma paremini kui nad iseennast tunnevad
Viimase 50 aasta jooksul on kiireneva teaduse edusammud genereerinud kasvava lõhe üldise teadmise ning nende teadmiste vahel, kes omavad ja opereerivad domineerivaid eliite. Tänu bioloogiale, neurobioloogiale ning rakenduslikule psühholoogiale, on „süsteem“ saanud nautida keerulist arusaama inimloomast, nii füüsiliselt kui psühholoogiliselt. Süsteem on paremini tuttavaks saanud tavainimesega kui tavainimene ise.
See tähendab, et enamikel juhtudel rakendab suuremat kontrolli ning võimu indiviidide üle – suuremat, kui indiviidid enda üle.
Täname meie vabatahtlikke eesti keelse tõlke eest :
Liisa Lotte Elme
Tanel Rander
Kaie Otstak
Jekaterina Novosjolova
Jelena Ivanova
Noam Chomsky - “10 strategies of manipulation” by the media
1. The strategy of distraction
The primary element of social control is the strategy of distraction which is to divert public attention from important issues and changes determined by the political and economic elites, by the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information. distraction strategy is also essential to prevent the public interest in the essential knowledge in the area of the science, economics, psychology, neurobiology and cybernetics. “Maintaining public attention diverted away from the real social problems, captivated by matters of no real importance. Keep the public busy, busy, busy, no time to think, back to farm and other animals (quote from text Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).”
2. Create problems, then offer solutions
This method is also called “problem -reaction- solution. “It creates a problem, a “situation” referred to cause some reaction in the audience, so this is the principal of the steps that you want to accept. For example: let it unfold and intensify urban violence, or arrange for bloody attacks in order that the public is the applicant‟s security laws and policies to the detriment of freedom. Or: create an economic crisis to accept as a necessary evil retreat of social rights and the dismantling of public services.
3. The gradual strategy
Acceptance to an unacceptable degree, just apply it gradually, dropper, for consecutive years. That is how they radically new socioeconomic conditions ( neoliberalism ) were imposed during the 1980s and 1990s: the minimal state, privatization, precariousness, flexibility, massive unemployment, wages, and do not guarantee a decent income, so many changes that have brought about a revolution if they had been applied once.
4. The strategy of deferring
Another way to accept an unpopular decision is to present it as “painful and necessary”, gaining public acceptance, at the time for future application. It is easier to accept that a future sacrifice of immediate slaughter. First, because the effort is not used immediately. Then, because the public, masses, is always the tendency to expect naively that “everything will be better tomorrow” and that the sacrifice required may be avoided. This gives the public more time to get used to the idea of change and accept it with resignation when the time comes.
5. Go to the public as a little child
Most of the advertising to the general public uses speech, argument, people and particularly children‟s intonation, often close to the weakness, as if the viewer were a little child or a mentally deficient. The harder one tries to deceive the viewer look, the more it tends to adopt a tone infantilising. Why? “If one goes to a person as if she had the age of 12 years or less, then, because of suggestion, she tends with a certain probability that a response or reaction also devoid of a critical sense as a person 12 years or younger (see Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).”
6. Use the emotional side more than the reflection
Making use of the emotional aspect is a classic technique for causing a short circuit on rational analysis , and finally to the critical sense of the individual. Furthermore, the use of emotional register to open the door to the unconscious for implantation or grafting ideas , desires, fears and anxieties , compulsions, or induce behaviors…
7. Keep the public in ignorance and mediocrity
Making the public incapable of understanding the technologies and methods used to control and enslavement. “The quality of education given to the lower social classes must be the poor and mediocre as possible so that the gap of ignorance it plans among the lower classes and upper classes is and remains impossible to attain for the lower classes (See „ Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).”
8. To encourage the public to be complacent with mediocrity
Promote the public to believe that the fact is fashionable to be stupid, vulgar and uneducated…
9. Self-blame Strengthen
To let individual blame for their misfortune, because of the failure of their intelligence, their abilities, or their efforts. So, instead of rebelling against the economic system, the individual autodesvalida and guilt, which creates a depression, one of whose effects is to inhibit its action. And, without action, there is no revolution!
10. Getting to know the individuals better than they know themselves
Over the past 50 years, advances of accelerated science has generated a growing gap between public knowledge and those owned and operated by dominant elites. Thanks to biology, neurobiology and applied psychology, the “system” has enjoyed a sophisticated understanding of human beings, both physically and psychologically. The system has gotten better acquainted with the common man more than he knows himself. This means that, in most cases, the system exerts greater control and great power over individuals, greater than that of individuals about themselves.
source > http://noam-chomsky.tumblr.com/post/13867896307/noam-chomsky-10-strategies-of-manipulation-by-the
Pühavaimu Residentuur Novemer 2013 : Evi Pärn ja külaline Olga Privis
Mõtted meedia võimust.
Novembri 2013 resident Pühavaimus : Evi Pärn.
Selle nädala jooksul oleme teinud koos Olga Privisega, kes on selle nädala külaline, uurimistööd Eesti trükiste kohta, valitud teemal : Meedia Võim. Arutlesime läbi paljusid teemasid, oleme võib olla isegi liiga palju arutlenud, aga mitte ainult omavahel…
Kuna meil oli tekkinud palju küsimusi, Olgaga koos me pöördusime mittu ajakirjanikutele, ja kohtusime ühe vene keelse ajalehe peatoimetajaga. Kahjuks vastuseid meie küsimustlee eriti optimistlikus ei saa pidada, aga lootust on. Ma ei hakka vist rokhem hetkel rääkima, proovin oma mõtted kokkuvõtta peale showingut..
Esimesel nädalal külaline on Olga Privis - "Etenduskunst on meie elu peegeldus; elu ongi kõige tähtsam ja põnevam etendus minu jaoks. Kui Evi kutsus mind nädalaks residentuuri, ma ei mõelnud, olin kohe nõus. Uudised tekitavad minus pidevalt küsimusi ja katse sellistes tingimustes pakutud teemale uue nurga alt vaadata on minu jaoks huvitav."
Esimesel nädalal külaline on Olga Privis - "Etenduskunst on meie elu peegeldus; elu ongi kõige tähtsam ja põnevam etendus minu jaoks. Kui Evi kutsus mind nädalaks residentuuri, ma ei mõelnud, olin kohe nõus. Uudised tekitavad minus pidevalt küsimusi ja katse sellistes tingimustes pakutud teemale uue nurga alt vaadata on minu jaoks huvitav."
Ja juba täna siis kell 21:30 Esimene Showing, mida vabalt saab külastada soovi korral , vt. rohkem infot ürituse kohta facebookis - https://www.facebook.com/events/175665015970846/
А тут кстати короткий ролик на русском языке - https://vimeo.com/78526147
4:21 hommikul, mis kajastub mingil viisil video pikkusega, mida ma hetkel renderan.
Video renderdab kahtlaselt liiga pikka aega juba, uni-uni aga kutsub nüüd….
screenshot.
Evi.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)